Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie SA/ Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów, Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie SA v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów, Final judgment, Case C-617/17, [2019] OJ C206/7, ECLI:EU:C:2019:283, OCL 267 (EU 2019), 3rd April 2019, Court of Justice of the European Union [CJEU]; European Court of Justice [ECJ]; European Court of Justice (4th Chamber)

From: Oxford Competition Law (http://oxcat.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 24 September 2020

Whether the principle of ne bis in idem enshrined in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as precluding a national competition authority from fining an undertaking in a single decision for an infringement of national competition law and for an infringement of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’).

Whether the principle of ne bis in idem could preclude a second Commission decision regarding the same anticompetitive conduct in circumstances where a first Commission decision had been annulled by the European Union General Court.

Whether fines must be proportionate when a national competition authority imposes two fines in a single decision in respect of an infringement of national competition law and of an infringement of Article 102 TFEU

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.