Whether the manufacturer of a car brand could have a relative dominant position vis-a-vis its retailer within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the Cartel Act (‘ACA’) now Article 4a ACA.
Whether contract clauses of a car manufacturer in relation to pricing and the passing-on of costs for services which were within the predominant interest of the manufacturer qualified as an abuse of a dominant position within the meaning of Article 5(1) of the ACA.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.
